Why Not Eat Insects by Marcel Dicke Movie Review

Essays on Why Not Eat Insects by Marcel Dicke Movie Review The paper "Why Not Eat Insects? by Marcel Dicke" is an excellent example of a movie review on biology. Marcel Dicke in the Video â€Å"Why not eat insects† s that that 80% of the world’s animals walk on six legs; therefore, they are insects (Dicke). In the world’s biodiversity, there are 6 million species of insects. This leads to the assertion that the world is a planet of insects and not humans since they are more abundant than humans.   Dicke argues that insects are significant contributors to the economy, even though people may not be aware of the fact; insects contribute free of charge towards developing the economy. Therefore, insects are not only contributors to the economy but also major delicacies in various parts of the world such as China (Dicke). However, while people in some parts knowingly consume insects as part of their daily diet, almost all people in the world consume insects unknowingly. This occurs because food processing makes use of products that are derived from insects. Therefore, food additives such as natural dyes are produced by insects. This means that insects contribute on a large scale to feeding the world’s population.Dicke observes that the world population is increasing dramatically; hence, there is a corresponding increase in the demand for food. Therefore, insects offer the only solution to the escalating global food problem. In addition, insects have a higher nutrient content in comparison to regular protein sources. Therefore, he argues that it is more economical to invest in insect production than investing in other forms of food. Evidently, 70% of the global agricultural land is used for livestock production (Dicke). This land would be significant enough to produce insects to feed the entire world. Already over 80% of the world’s population are eating insects; therefore, the remaining 20% should follow suit (Dicke). All that is required is changing perceptions and mindsets in as far as insects are concerned. A number of entrepreneurs have already taken up serving insects as delicacies in their restaurants; hence, kick-starting the road towards a world that values insects as a primary source of nutrition.

What are the Principles of criminal liability Free Essays

SECTION A 1.The facts of the case are that the defendant (Morris) went into a self-service store in which he picked some articles (items) from the shelves. He then swapped the price tags of those items with lower ones. We will write a custom essay sample on What are the Principles of criminal liability? or any similar topic only for you Order Now The defendant then carried the items to the till where he presented the articles and paid the lower (unreal) price for them. He was apprehended and convicted of theft by means of appropriation contrary to section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 and was fined ˆ50 for each count of theft in which the payment period must not exceed 3 months. The defendant appealed against the ruling of the Crown court on the assertion that the jury was misguided to hold that the substitution of price tickets or tags of articles with lower ones by the appellant as appropriation under section 3(1) of the Theft Act 1968. Secondly, as to the question of what appropriation really meant in the theft act and implications of switching price labels of goods in a self service shop. The Court of Appeal confirmed that the decision of the Crown Court was right and the appeal was dismissed. When it got to the House of Lords, it was still refused. 2.The original decision was that the defendant was convicted in the Crown court for theft contrary to section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 which says that ‘A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it; and â€Å"thief† and â€Å"steal† shall be construed accordingly’. He was fined ˆ100 for two counts of theft (ˆ50 for each count) in which he was to complete the payments within a period not exceeding 3 months or face a jail sentence of 74 days for each count of theft upon failure to pay the fines. 3. The jury was instructed by the judge that the defendant was guilty of theft by appropriation under Section 3(1) of the Theft Act 1968 if it was established that he switched the prices of the articles in the self-service shop. He was found guilty and convicted. The defendant appealed on the grounds that the jury was misguided by the judge that the switching of price tags of articles in the shop by him was appropriation according to section 3(1) of the 1968 Theft Act. Secondly, the defendant appealed against the conviction to query the real meaning of appropriation according to the Theft Act 1968 and the implication of swapping labels or price tickets on articles in a shop in order purchase at a lower price. 4.The case was first heard in the Crown Court where the defendant was convicted and fined ˆ100. The defendant later appealed in the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) where the appellant (Morris) claimed that the assistant recorder (Judge) misguided the jury by directing them to see the swapping of price ticket or tag of articles by the appellant as appropriation under Section 3(1) of the Theft Act 1968. The decision was upheld in the Court of Appeal and his appeal was dismissed. The appellant then took it to the House of Lords (which was then the final court of appeal). 5.The final outcome of the appeals was that they were all dismissed. The defendant had first appealed against the decision of the Crown court in the Court of Appeal. The appeal was based on the claim that the judge misled the jury by directing them to see the switching of price tickets of articles by the appellant as appropriation under Section 3(1) of the Theft Act 1968. Also, the appellant appealed against his conviction to inquire on what appropriation really denotes according to the Theft Act 1968 and the implication of swapping labels of articles or goods in a shop in order to cheat the owner. But the appeal was not allowed. The Court of Appeal established that the direction by the Judge in the Crown court was valid and that the prosecution ought not to prove that the appellant assumed all the rights of the owner; but it is sufficient if the appellant assumed any of the rights of the owner claiming an article as his. In the present case, by taking the articles from the shelves, the appellant had appropriated and replacing the price tickets with lower ones meant that he was claiming one of the rights of the owner. The appellant was still found guilty of theft by appropriation and the appeal was still dismissed by the Court of Appeal. The appellant requested for leave to appeal to the House of Lords but was denied by the Court of Appeal. The application for leave to appeal was later granted to the appellant by the Appeals Committee of the House of Lords but the leave to appeal was denied; and the appeal was finally dismissed. SECTION B ‘A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other from it’. The elements of theft in the above definition can be classified under the actus reus and men rea. The actus reus elements are appropriation, property, and belonging to another. While the means rea elements are dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive. APPROPRIATION- This is defined in Section 3(1) of the Theft Act 1968 as ‘Any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner amounts to an appropriation, and this includes, where he has come by the property (innocently or not) without stealing it, any later assumption of a right to it by keeping or dealing with it as owner’. There is no prerequisite that all the rights of the owner must be assumed, but any of the rights is sufficient. In Morris (1983)[6], the defendant entered a self-service store where he picked some items from the shelves. He then swapped the price tickets of those items with lower ones. The defendant then carried the items to the till where he presented the articles and paid the lower price for them. He was apprehended and convicted of theft by means of appropriation contrary to section 3(1) of the Theft Act 1968. It was held that the appropriation took place at the point of the labels, which was one of the rights of the owner. PROPERTY- In order to establish liability, one must prove that the defendant appropriated a ‘property’. Section 4(1)of the theft act defines property in terms of cash, real or private, intangible and things in action like patent rights, debt, etc. that can be legally enforceable. Intangible property has no physical existence. However, private information does not amount to intangible property in the context of s 4(1). In Oxford v Moss a University student took a copy of an exam paper which he read and returned after using the information to cheat in the exam. It was held that confidential information could not amount to an intangible property under s 4(1) of the Theft Act 1968. Therefore, it can’t be stolen. BELONGING TO ANOTHER- Section 5(1)of the act specifies that property will be deemed belonging to anybody in possession or ‘control of it’. Ironically this means that one could be criminally responsible for theft of their properties if it is in someone’s possession. In Turner (1971) the defendant brought his car to a garage to be repaired. The job was completed but He used his spare key to take the car from the garage without paying. Turner was found guilty of stealing his own car since he intended to ‘permanently deprive’ the present possessor of his car. DISHONESTY- This was not really defined by the act. Section 2(1) just describes situations where a person is not considered as being dishonest, that is, if he has justification to deny the other person of his property and trusts the other party will approve of that. In Ghosh (1982) the Court of Appeal established a two-stage test for dishonesty which encompasses both objective and subjective elements. The jury ought to answer these questions: Has the defendant been dishonest by the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people (objective test)If the answer is yes, did the defendant realise that he or she was dishonest by those standards (subjective test)If the answer is yes to the second question, there is dishonesty. The accused acts were dishonest and he realised it. The appeal was dismissed and conviction upheld. INTENTION TO PERMANENTLY DEPRIVE- Under Section 6(1)of the Act, a person is regarded as having the required intention if he/she treats property as his/her own irrespective of the owner’s rights. In Lavender (1994), the defendant removed two doors from a council property which he used replace damaged doors in his girlfriend’s house which owned by the same council. It was held that Lavender had the intention to permanently deprive under section 6(1) as he treated the doors as his own to dispose of irrespective of the rights of the owners. BIBLIOGRAPHY-BOOKS, JOURNALS, AND STATUTES. (Stefan Fafinski and Emily Finch, 2007. Criminal Law, p. 157, Pearson Education Limited) The Theft Act 1968 (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/enacted ) WEB SOURCES Westlaw-R v Morris (David) [1983] 2 W.L.R. 768, [1983] Q.B. 587(http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?src=rlsuppsrguid=ia744d05e000001305bc8fe7a0c5eae54docguid=I5ABBC1D0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9hitguid=I5ABB9AC1E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9spos=106epos=106td=175crumb-action=appendcontext=20resolvein=true) Lexis library- R v Morris [1983] 2 All ER 448 (http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/runRemoteLink.do?langcountry=GBlinkInfo=F%23GB%23ALLER%23sel2%252%25year%251983%25page%25448%25sel1%251983%25vol%252%25risb=21_T12097631828bct=Aservice=citationA=0.8364451140113925) The Law of Theft (http://www.e-lawresources.co.uk/Theft.php) Cases on Theft (http://www.lawteacher.net/criminal-law/cases/theft-cases.php) Theft (http://sixthformlaw.info/01_modules/mod3a/3_60_propety_offences/01_theft.htm) Power Point Presentation on theft (heolddulaw.wikispaces.com/file/view/13+Theft.ppt) How to cite What are the Principles of criminal liability?, Essay examples

The Effectiveness of Almonds with Honey free essay sample

You can try following homemade face packs as they are cost effective and they actually work wonders to give you a smooth and glowing complexion. This paper collects and analyses the latest data and samples corresponding to the study of Almonds with honey for curing facial and skin problems. It also highlights the current problems such as oily skin, blackheads and dark skin that usually occur to women. Natural ways of treatment applying to skin through foods we eat have been continuously recognized upon humankinds. The intelligence of people nowadays, gave a great impact not only in the field of health but also in the development of resourcefulness. Honey is loaded with anti-microbial properties and is a natural antioxidant. Honey fights microbial infections that cause acne without irritating your skin. Honey also pulls out impurities from your pores that would normally stay clogged, festering bacteria that causes pimples. It will also help restore your skin’s texture and reduce damage done to your skin by the sun and daily environments you come in contact with. Fortunately, the delicately flavored and versatile almond is available throughout the year to make a healthy and tasty addition to both sweet and savory dishes. This nut is also packed with vitamin E, copper and folic acid. It is also very rich in antioxidant phytochemicals, which boosts up the body’s immune system. They are absolutely beneficial. Nevertheless, Almonds and honey are nutritious foods that can cure and prevent many diseases. As a matter of fact, these also reduce risk of heart disease, diabetes and heart attack. III. Statement of the problem The effectiveness of Almonds and honey aims to answer the following questions: . Are these foods effective enough to prevent oily and dark skin? b. Does the product have bad effects upon using this? c. Are they easy to apply to skin or use for prevention? IV. Significance of the study The study of the almonds with honey used for skin care would be beneficial to society and specific persons. Due to self awareness, the researc her came up with a good study that can contribute to the wellness of the country. The study’s goal is designed to have an easier source for prevention and to be aware with the other benefits of the foods we have. Also, this product will be very useful for us humankinds because of its inexpensiveness but an effective way of curing. In the field of business and economy, this product can be a great source of income for people who are not employed. With this, sales in the market would be increasing. Furthermore, we can export this to other countries for the improvement of the country’s economy. For other researchers all over the world, this product will give them brilliant ideas for producing and learning more researches that can be used in our daily lives. Additional, they can also improve this product to contribute new knowledge in science. Study and Sources The review of the study deals on how almonds with honey contribute to skin health and care. It focuses on the minerals and nutrients which are used in attaining a great solution for skin and facial problems. Thus, other benefits and important details are also included in the study. Facts were gathered from the Internet as references to be able to complete the information needed. A. What is an almond (Prunus dulcis)? The almond is a species of tree native to the Middle East and South Asia. Almond is also the name of the edible and widely cultivated seed of this tree. Within the genus Prunus, it is classified with the peach in the subgenus Amygdalus, distinguished from the other subgenera by the corrugated shell (endocarp) surrounding the seed. Source: http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Almond B. What are the causes of having an oily and dark skin? Oily skin is caused by over-active seb aceous glands, which produce a substance called sebum, a naturally healthy skin lubricant. When the skin produces excessive sebum, it becomes heavy and thick in texture. Oily skin is typified by shininess, blemishes and pimples. The oily-skin type is not necessarily bad, since such skin is less prone to wrinkling, or other signs of aging because the oil helps to keep needed moisture locked into the epidermis. The natural skin color can be darkened as a result of tanning due to exposure to sunlight. The leading theory is that skin color adapts to intense sunlight irradiation to provide partial protection against the ultraviolet fraction which produces damage and thus mutations in the DNA of the skin cells. Source: http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Human_skin#Oily_skin http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Human_skin_color C. Health benefits of Almonds and Honey Almonds are a very good source of vitamin E and manganese. Almonds are a good source of magnesium, copper, riboflavin (vitamin B2), and phosphorus. Fortunately, although one-quarter cup of almonds contains about 18 grams of fat, most of it (11 grams) is heart-healthy monounsaturated fat. The benefits of honey go beyond its great taste. It is natures energy booster and a great immunity system builder. Honey is a natural remedy for many ailments. Source: http://www. whfoods. com/genpage. php? tname=foodspiceamp;dbid=20 http://www. benefits-of-honey. com/health-benefits-of-honey. html VI. Definition of terms Complexion- refers to the natural color, texture, and appearance of the skin, especially that of the face. Antioxidant- is a molecule that inhibits the oxidation of other molecules. Hypothesis- is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. Prevention- to avoid doing; stay away from dangerous or risky things. Wellness- the quality or state of being healthy in body and mind especially as the result of deliberate effort. Remedies- treatments that employ common items from the home Self-awareness- is the capacity for introspection and the ability to reconcile oneself as an individual separate from the environment and other individuals. VII. Hypothesis * Almonds with Honey are effective treatment for reducing the oiliness and darkness of the skin. Applying the treatment by using almonds with honey makes the skin unhealthy. Â  The preparation for the application of using almonds with honey is as follows: Materials: Almonds Honey Washcloth Clean water Procedure: Mix a small amount of ground almonds with honey amp; gently massage into your skin with a hot washcloth. You can use this to gently scrub your face, getting rid of the excess oil on the surface of your skin and the dead skin cells. Finally, rinse cool water.